Thomas Sowell
We all know
that guns can cost lives because the media repeat this message endlessly,
as if we could not figure it out for ourselves. But even someone
who reads newspapers regularly and watches numerous television newscasts
may never learn that guns also save lives – much less see any hard
facts comparing how many lives are lost and how many are saved.
The defensive
use of guns is usually either not discussed at all in the media
or else is depicted as if it means bullets flying in all directions,
like the gunfight at the OK Corral. But most defensive uses of guns
do not involve actually pulling the trigger.
If someone
comes at you with a knife and you point a gun at him, he is very
unlikely to keep coming, and far more likely to head in the other
direction, perhaps in some haste, if he has a brain in his head.
Only if he is an idiot are you likely to have to pull the trigger.
And if he is an idiot with a knife coming after you, you had better
have a trigger to pull.
Surveys of
American gun owners have found that 4 to 6 percent reported using
a gun in self-defense within the previous five years. That is not
a very high percentage but, in a country with 300 million people,
that works out to hundreds of thousands of defensive uses of guns
per year.
Yet we almost
never hear about these hundreds of thousands of defensive uses of
guns from the media, which will report the killing of a dozen people
endlessly around the clock.
The murder
of a dozen innocent people is unquestionably a human tragedy. But
that is no excuse for reacting blindly by preventing hundreds of
thousands of other people from defending themselves against meeting
the same fate.
Although most
defensive uses of guns do not involve actually shooting, nevertheless
the total number of criminals killed by armed private citizens runs
into the thousands per year. A gun can also come in handy if a pit
bull or some other dangerous animal is after you or your child.
We need to
recognize the painful reality that, regardless of what we do or
don't do about gun control laws, there will be innocent people killed
by guns. We can then look at hard facts in order to decide how we
can minimize the number of needless deaths.
But that is
not the way the issue is presented by many in politics or the media.
Every story about an accidental shooting in the home will be repeated
again and again, while a thousand stories about lives saved by defensive
uses of a gun will never see the light of day in most newspapers
or on most television newscasts.
More children
may die in bathtub accidents than in shooting accidents, but you
are not likely to read that in most newspapers or see it on television
newscasts. Some in the media inflate the number of children killed
by counting as children the members of criminal teenage gangs who
shoot each other in their turf fights.
Many seize
upon statistics which show that Britain has stronger gun control
laws than the United States and lower murder rates. Yet they ignore
other countries with stronger gun control laws than the United States,
but which have much higher murder rates, such as Brazil, Russia
and Mexico.
Even
in the case of Britain, London had a much lower murder rate than
New York during the years after New York State's 1911 Sullivan Law
imposed very strict gun control, while anyone could buy a shotgun
in London with no questions asked in the 1950s.
Today, virtually
the entire law-abiding population of Britain is disarmed – and gun
crimes are vastly more common. Gun control laws make crime a safer
occupation when victims are unarmed.
The gun control
crusade today is like the Prohibition crusade 100 years ago. It
is a shared zealotry that binds the self-righteous know-it-alls
in a warm fellowship of those who see themselves as fighting on
the side of the angels against the forces of evil. It is a lofty
role that they are not about to give up for anything so mundane
as facts – or even the lives of other people.
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário